javascript - What is the difference between call and apply?

ID : 154

viewed : 141

Tags : javascriptperformancefunctiondynamicjavascript

Top 5 Answer for javascript - What is the difference between call and apply?

vote vote


The difference is that apply lets you invoke the function with arguments as an array; call requires the parameters be listed explicitly. A useful mnemonic is "A for array and C for comma."

See MDN's documentation on apply and call.

Pseudo syntax:

theFunction.apply(valueForThis, arrayOfArgs), arg1, arg2, ...)

There is also, as of ES6, the possibility to spread the array for use with the call function, you can see the compatibilities here.

Sample code:

function theFunction(name, profession) {     console.log("My name is " + name + " and I am a " + profession +"."); } theFunction("John", "fireman"); theFunction.apply(undefined, ["Susan", "school teacher"]);, "Claude", "mathematician");, ...["Matthew", "physicist"]); // used with the spread operator

vote vote


K. Scott Allen has a nice writeup on the matter.

Basically, they differ on how they handle function arguments.

The apply() method is identical to call(), except apply() requires an array as the second parameter. The array represents the arguments for the target method."


// assuming you have f function f(message) { ... }, "test"); f.apply(receiver, ["test"]); 
vote vote


To answer the part about when to use each function, use apply if you don't know the number of arguments you will be passing, or if they are already in an array or array-like object (like the arguments object to forward your own arguments. Use call otherwise, since there's no need to wrap the arguments in an array., a, b, c); // Fixed number of arguments  f.apply(thisObject, arguments); // Forward this function's arguments  var args = []; while (...) {     args.push(some_value()); } f.apply(thisObject, args); // Unknown number of arguments 

When I'm not passing any arguments (like your example), I prefer call since I'm calling the function. apply would imply you are applying the function to the (non-existent) arguments.

There shouldn't be any performance differences, except maybe if you use apply and wrap the arguments in an array (e.g. f.apply(thisObject, [a, b, c]) instead of, a, b, c)). I haven't tested it, so there could be differences, but it would be very browser specific. It's likely that call is faster if you don't already have the arguments in an array and apply is faster if you do.

vote vote


Here's a good mnemonic. Apply uses Arrays and Always takes one or two Arguments. When you use Call you have to Count the number of arguments.

vote vote


While this is an old topic, I just wanted to point out that .call is slightly faster than .apply. I can't tell you exactly why.

See jsPerf,


Douglas Crockford mentions briefly the difference between the two, which may help explain the performance difference...

Apply takes an array of arguments, while Call takes zero or more individual parameters! Ah hah!

.apply(this, [...])

.call(this, param1, param2, param3, param4...)

Top 3 video Explaining javascript - What is the difference between call and apply?