Try using tqdm.notebook.tqdm instead of tqdm, as outlined here.

This could be as simple as changing your import to:

from tqdm.notebook import tqdm

Good luck!

EDIT: After testing, it seems that tqdm actually works fine in 'text mode' in Jupyter notebook. It's hard to tell because you haven't provided a minimal example, but it looks like your problem is caused by a print statement in each iteration. The print statement is outputting a number (~0.89) in between each status bar update, which is messing up the output. Try removing the print statement.

This is an alternative answer for the case where tqdm_notebook doesn't work for you.

Given the following example:

from time import sleep from tqdm import tqdm  values = range(3) with tqdm(total=len(values)) as pbar:     for i in values:         pbar.write('processed: %d' %i)         pbar.update(1)         sleep(1) 

The output would look something like this (progress would show up red):

  0%|          | 0/3 [00:00<?, ?it/s] processed: 1  67%|██████▋   | 2/3 [00:01<00:00,  1.99it/s] processed: 2 100%|██████████| 3/3 [00:02<00:00,  1.53it/s] processed: 3 

The problem is that the output to stdout and stderr are processed asynchronously and separately in terms of new lines.

If say Jupyter receives on stderr the first line and then the "processed" output on stdout. Then once it receives an output on stderr to update the progress, it wouldn't go back and update the first line as it would only update the last line. Instead it will have to write a new line.

Workaround 1, writing to stdout

One workaround would be to output both to stdout instead:

import sys from time import sleep from tqdm import tqdm  values = range(3) with tqdm(total=len(values), file=sys.stdout) as pbar:     for i in values:         pbar.write('processed: %d' % (1 + i))         pbar.update(1)         sleep(1) 

The output will change to (no more red):

processed: 1   | 0/3 [00:00<?, ?it/s] processed: 2   | 0/3 [00:00<?, ?it/s] processed: 3   | 2/3 [00:01<00:00,  1.99it/s] 100%|██████████| 3/3 [00:02<00:00,  1.53it/s] 

Here we can see that Jupyter doesn't seem to clear until the end of the line. We could add another workaround for that by adding spaces. Such as:

import sys from time import sleep from tqdm import tqdm  values = range(3) with tqdm(total=len(values), file=sys.stdout) as pbar:     for i in values:         pbar.write('processed: %d%s' % (1 + i, ' ' * 50))         pbar.update(1)         sleep(1) 

Which gives us:

processed: 1                                                   processed: 2                                                   processed: 3                                                   100%|██████████| 3/3 [00:02<00:00,  1.53it/s] 

Workaround 2, set description instead

It might in general be more straight forward not to have two outputs but update the description instead, e.g.:

import sys from time import sleep from tqdm import tqdm  values = range(3) with tqdm(total=len(values), file=sys.stdout) as pbar:     for i in values:         pbar.set_description('processed: %d' % (1 + i))         pbar.update(1)         sleep(1) 

With the output (description updated while it's processing):

processed: 3: 100%|██████████| 3/3 [00:02<00:00,  1.53it/s] 

Conclusion

You can mostly get it to work fine with plain tqdm. But if tqdm_notebook works for you, just use that (but then you'd probably not read that far).

Most of the answers are outdated now. Better if you import tqdm correctly.

from tqdm import tqdm_notebook as tqdm 

To complete oscarbranson's answer: it's possible to automatically pick console or notebook versions of progress bar depending on where it's being run from:

from tqdm.autonotebook import tqdm 

More info can be found here

If the other tips here don't work and - just like me - you're using the pandas integration through progress_apply, you can let tqdm handle it:

from tqdm.autonotebook import tqdm tqdm.pandas()  df.progress_apply(row_function, axis=1) 

The main point here lies in the tqdm.autonotebook module. As stated in their instructions for use in IPython Notebooks, this makes tqdm choose between progress bar formats used in Jupyter notebooks and Jupyter consoles - for a reason still lacking further investigations on my side, the specific format chosen by tqdm.autonotebook works smoothly in pandas, while all others didn't, for progress_apply specifically.